This bug was exposed by fixing the following leak in the resources test:
==29204== 11,456 (84 direct, 11,372 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 859 of 861
==29204== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==29204== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==29204== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==29204== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==29204== by 0x409B227: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1029)
==29204== by 0x41936CF: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1872)
==29204== by 0x417CCC9: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1839)
==29204== by 0x417C6F4: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1703)
==29204== by 0x417CC5A: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1820)
==29204== by 0x417C1DB: g_object_new (gobject.c:1535)
==29204== by 0x41E5E29: g_converter_input_stream_new (gconverterinputstream.c:204)
==29204== by 0x4228D38: g_resource_open_stream (gresource.c:363)
==29204== 7,192 (76 direct, 7,116 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 855 of 861
==29204== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==29204== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==29204== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==29204== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==29204== by 0x409B227: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1029)
==29204== by 0x41936CF: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1872)
==29204== by 0x417CCC9: g_object_constructor (gobject.c:1839)
==29204== by 0x417C6F4: g_object_newv (gobject.c:1703)
==29204== by 0x417CC5A: g_object_new_valist (gobject.c:1820)
==29204== by 0x417C1DB: g_object_new (gobject.c:1535)
==29204== by 0x424E815: g_zlib_decompressor_new (gzlibdecompressor.c:270)
==29204== by 0x4228DD8: g_resource_lookup_data (gresource.c:422)
==28778== 700 (20 direct, 680 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 842 of 863
==28778== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==28778== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==28778== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==28778== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==28778== by 0x405396B: g_bytes_new_with_free_func (gbytes.c:173)
==28778== by 0x405390D: g_bytes_new_take (gbytes.c:122)
==28778== by 0x804C2B1: test_uri_query_info (resources.c:435)
==28318== 38 (12 direct, 26 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 613 of 865
==28318== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==28318== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==28318== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==28318== by 0x4084AB4: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:361)
==28318== by 0x4229599: g_resources_enumerate_children (gresource.c:806)
==28318== by 0x804B39E: test_resource_registred (resources.c:283)
==27820== 31 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 587 of 866
==27820== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==27820== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==27820== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==27820== by 0x4084AB4: g_malloc_n (gmem.c:361)
==27820== by 0x409D6A1: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:356)
==27820== by 0x4069FF7: g_get_current_dir (gfileutils.c:2544)
==27820== by 0x804BCA7: test_resource_module (resources.c:370)
==27020== 44 (24 direct, 20 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 684 of 936
==27020== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==27020== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==27020== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==27020== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==27020== by 0x40BC038: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:969)
==27020== by 0x40B5277: g_variant_get_variant (gvariant.c:749)
==27020== by 0x4273182: gvdb_table_value_from_item (gvdb-reader.c:478)
==27020== by 0x42731E8: gvdb_table_get_value (gvdb-reader.c:509)
==27020== by 0x4228B36: do_lookup (gresource.c:280)
==27020== by 0x4228F56: g_resource_get_info (gresource.c:492)
==26427== 24 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 608 of 965
==26427== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==26427== by 0x4084724: standard_malloc (gmem.c:85)
==26427== by 0x40847C7: g_malloc (gmem.c:159)
==26427== by 0x409B1E1: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1003)
==26427== by 0x40BC038: g_variant_get_child_value (gvariant-core.c:969)
==26427== by 0x40BA89F: g_variant_valist_get (gvariant.c:4482)
==26427== by 0x40BAC23: g_variant_get_va (gvariant.c:4681)
==26427== by 0x40BAB29: g_variant_get (gvariant.c:4633)
==26427== by 0x4228BA5: do_lookup (gresource.c:293)
==26427== by 0x4228F51: g_resource_get_info (gresource.c:493)
==9458== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 16 of 39
==9458== at 0x402AD89: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==9458== by 0x4221A1F: vasprintf (vasprintf.c:78)
==9458== by 0x40C6065: g_vasprintf (gprintf.c:314)
==9458== by 0x409D894: g_strdup_vprintf (gstrfuncs.c:509)
==9458== by 0x409D8C9: g_strdup_printf (gstrfuncs.c:535)
==9458== by 0x40672E9: g_environ_setenv (genviron.c:156)
==9458== by 0x80490E7: test_environ_array (environment.c:78)
==9458== by 0x40A3DB5: test_case_run (gtestutils.c:1662)
==9458== by 0x40A40B2: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1715)
==9458== by 0x40A417C: g_test_run_suite_internal (gtestutils.c:1726)
==9458== by 0x40A42F9: g_test_run_suite (gtestutils.c:1771)
==9458== by 0x40A3441: g_test_run (gtestutils.c:1319)
==9458== by 0x80493F1: main (environment.c:108)
Bug #669412.
Helper scripts in C can be problematic for cross compiling: the compiler
produces executables for the target platform, which the host is usually
unable to run.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669224
The glib-compile-resources --generate-dependencies call was failing,
although not stopping the build.
Failed to open file 'test2.gresource.xml': No such file or directory
Failed to open file 'test3.gresource.xml': No such file or directory
Failed to open file 'test4.gresource.xml': No such file or directory
Failed to open file 'test.gresource.xml': No such file or directory
We need to do this because constructors run before main() and
thus before any call to g_mem_set_vtable, making it impossible to
use that function if constructors call g_malloc.
We do this by making the constructors just register the static data
for lazy registration, doing the lazy registration when using
the global resource set.
With this we're not longer exporting the constructor headers, which means
we're not tying ourselves to a macro that might need special tweaking on
a compiler-by-compiler basis.
