The executable name can be a useful bit of information to match on in
searches where it differs from the name (for example because the latter
is localised), but will produce surprising results where the real appli-
cation is executed by a shared binary (for example interpretors like
gjs or python, or sandboxes like flatpak).
Address this by adding a blacklist of binary names that are ignored
in search.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795488
Removing the event and closing the related file descriptor must be
done first to make sure the kqueue subsystem delete pending events.
The timeout must be disarmed before freeing the directory dependency
list otherwise it might populate it again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795193
This makes it a bit easier for debugging which files were generated from
which introspection XML.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650875
glib-genmarshal shows redundant "time" warning message against combination with --header and --body option.
Before:
WARNING: Using --header and --body at the same time time is deprecated; use --body --prototypes instead
After:
WARNING: Using --header and --body at the same time is deprecated; use --body --prototypes instead
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795429
Signed-off-by: Kentaro Hayashi <hayashi@clear-code.com>
For a long time we've had it as 'common knowledge' that criticals are
for programmer errors and warnings are for external errors, but we've
never documented that. Do so.
(Modified by Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com> to apply cleanly to
master; rearranged to fit in with current master documentation.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741049
And warn in other parts of the code if the caller attempts
to change the array bounds during destruction, this is not
a valid operation.
(Tweaked by Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com> to not use inline
for loop declarations, since we can’t support them in GLib at the
moment.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769064
On gcc 4.7, we got the following error:
i686-nptl-linux-gnu-gcc --version
> i686-nptl-linux-gnu-gcc (crosstool-NG 1.20.0) 4.7.4
> $ echo '#include <glib-object.h>' | i686-nptl-linux-gnu-gcc -x c -I
staging/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I staging/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -Wall
-Werror -c - -o /tmp/foo.o
> In file included from
staging/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gbinding.h:29:0,
> from staging/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib-object.h:23,
> from <stdin>:1:
> staging/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h: In function
'g_set_object':
> staging/usr/include/glib-2.0/gobject/gobject.h:725:5: error: value
computed is not used [-Werror=unused-value]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
This error has been added by commit 3fae39a5d7
So enable the new g_set_object definition only if gcc >= 4.8
Fixes:
- http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b29a2f868438a2210873ea72f491db63175848be
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795138
When cross compiling and not exe wrapper has been defined cc.run() raise
an exception. Avoid this by taking the value from [properties] in the
cross file and provide sensible default if the variable is not defined.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794898
Add a test for monitoring an existing local file, with the
WATCH_HARD_LINKS flag specified. This would previously cause a crash;
now it doesn’t.
This test contains a FIXME where I suspect we should be getting some
additional file change notifications from changes made through the hard
link; this requires further follow up and probably further fixes to our
inotify backend.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755721
This gets the G_FILE_MONITOR_WATCH_HARD_LINKS flag to the state where it
doesn’t cause crashes, and essentially acts as a no-op. It will not yet
actually monitor for changes made via hard links.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755721
The call to _start() fills in the dirname, basename, and filename
arguments according to the following rules:
dir watches: dirname filled
file watches: dirname and basename filled
hardlink: filename filled
This doesn't map to how the current inotify backend works very nicely,
so we need to adjust things a bit when creating our "sub" objects.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755721
This test will only work on machines which have IPv6 enabled and have a
local IPv6 interface with ID 1. On machines which don’t (such as AWS
servers, which we run CI tests on), the GResolver tests will fail with
G_RESOLVER_ERROR_INVALID. We can’t differentiate this kind of failure
(where we’d want to skip the test) from an actual failure (where we’d
want to fail the test), so the only other option is to drop this
particular test vector. I don’t think it’s a significant loss.
This is the last fix needed to get our CI tests working reliably on
jenkins.gnome.org.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795234
There are various reasons why setting up a server might fail; it
reliably fails on AWS with IPv6 addresses (are we binding to the right
address?). Since we’re trying to test GSocket as a client, skip tests
where that happens.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795234
The tests which check permissions and errors like EACCES aren’t going to
work as root, since root always has permission to do things. Skip them
if running as root.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766390
Make it more obvious that an explicit check isn’t needed for the upper
bound on years, since it’s limited by the type width.
Add a unit test to demonstrate this.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540013
GDate.dmy is a 1-bit bitfield which is treated as a boolean. However,
it’s still an integer, and we can’t really treat it like a gboolean
because it’s a bitfield. Make the comparisons with it explicitly compare
integers, rather than implicitly, to make it more obvious that it is
actually an integer.
This introduces no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335731
These turn undefined or hard-to-detect misbehaviour into a well-defined
critical warning and early return.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=335731
It’s possible to get a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning out of this code
with some GCC versions. Rework the code to avoid needing the conditional
free.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728108
This was a small leak of a GDateTime instance from an internal helper
function, which was using it to calculate week numbers, and then forgot
to free it.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795165
This is a non-trivial accessor which gets the identifier string used to
create the GTimeZone — unless the string passed to g_time_zone_new() was
invalid, in which case the identifier will be `UTC`.
Implementing this required reworking how timezone information was loaded
so that the tz->name is always set at the same time as tz->t_info, so
they are in sync. Previously, the tz->name was unconditionally set to
whatever was passed to g_time_zone_new(), and then not updated if the
tz->t_info was eventually set to the default UTC information.
This includes tests for the new g_time_zone_get_identifier() API, and
for the g_date_time_get_timezone() API added in the previous commit.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795165
While 333 runs is very likely to reproduce the bug, Milan has previously
reproduced it with as few as 9 runs. Since this test will be run by the
CI machinery quite often, a lower number of runs each CI run will still
probably catch any regressions over time.
This reduces the total test runtime from 33s to 2s.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793727
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Reviewed-by: nobody
When using g_network_monitor_get_default() from another thread, it’s
possible for network-changed events to be processed after an instance of
GNetworkMonitor has been disposed, causing use-after-free problems.
Fix that by moving some of the initialisation into the GInitable.init()
chain, rather than in a main context idle callback.
This includes a unit test which probabilistically reproduces the bug
(but can’t do so deterministically due to it being a race condition).
Commit amended by Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com> before
pushing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793727
gdatetime testcase uses glib (which uses libintl), but *alsi* calls
libintl functions on its own, as part of the testing process.
Therefore it must be linked to libintl like any other program that
uses it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794556
We do not need to use FindFirstFileW() to get a reparse tag if the
file that is being examined is not a reparse point.
This is a quick and relatively painless fix for the fact that
FindFirstFileW() fails on root directories. Since root directories
are unlikely to be reparse points (is it even possible?), not using
this function on non-reparse-points just sidesteps the issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795153
If a handle was obtained from a fd that we got from up the stack,
we shouldn't call CloseHandle() on it in case of an error.
This is a bug. Luckily, it happens only on the error codepath, so,
hopefully, no one had hit it yet.
Spotted while running valgrind on gsettings-test, as per the previous
commit.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Reviewed-by: nobody
When using g_settings_bind(), if a range binding triggers a range check
failure, g_settings_binding_property_changed() will return early, but it
won't cleanup properly causing some leaks. The binding will also still
be marked as 'running', which causes an assertion failure when trying to
free it:
"g_settings_binding_free: assertion failed: (!binding->running)"
Signed-off-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794805
There is no transfer annotation that can express transfer semantics of
g_object_new_with_properties in general. When GInitiallyUnowned object
is constructed the introspection data will be incorrect.
Mark it with skip annotation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795025
