We used to perform unneeded lock/unlock dances to perform block, unblock
and disconnect actions, and these were potentially unsafe because we
might have looped in data that could be potentially be changed by other
threads.
We could have also done the same by saving the handlers ids in a
temporary array and eventually remove them, but I don't see a reason for
that since we can just keep all locked without the risk of creating
deadlocks.
Coverity CID: #1474757, #1474771, #1474429
The test was flacky because we were only relying on the presence of a
file, while the callback could have not been called yet, while ensure
for both assumptions to be true before stop iterating the loop.
Fix a regression from commit abddb42d14, where it could pass `NULL` to
`g_task_get_cancellable()`, triggering a critical warning. This could
happen because the lifetime of `data->task` is not as long as the
lifetime of the `ConnectionAttempt`, but the code assumed it was.
Fix the problem by keeping a strong ref to that `GCancellable` around
until the `ConnectionAttempt` is finished being destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2687
ci: Specify -Wno-overlength-strings on macOS
gstdio: Do not pass wrong pointer types to FILETIME to unix conversion
build: Specify -Werror=pointer-sign
See merge request GNOME/glib!2807
This can catch the wrong pointer being passed to a function argument (in
some cases), with few false positives.
Spotted while testing !2529.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
This disables the following warning, which was causing CI failures on
macOS when building the libpcre2 subproject:
```
../subprojects/pcre2-10.40/src/pcre2_error.c:66:3: error: string literal of length 4380 exceeds maximum length 4095 that ISO C99 compilers are required to support [-Werror,-Woverlength-strings]
```
We don’t want to explicitly rely on using overlength strings in GLib,
which is why this change is a `CFLAGS` in the CI configuration, rather
than setting a project-level argument in `meson.build`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
We ended up always skipping showing the scheduler settings errors after
the first call, while we were already setting such variable atomically
in case it needed to.
Related to: #1672
As per the rationale explained in the previous commit, we could end up
having the unused_threads value not to be conformant to what
g_thread_pool_get_num_threads() returns, because an about-to-be-unused
thread might not be counted yet as such, while the pool threads number
has been already decreased.
To avoid such scenario, and to make sure that when all the pool's
threads are stopped, they're unmarked as unused, let's increase the
unused_threads value earlier, while we still own the pool lock so that
it will always include the pool that is not used anymore, but not yet
queued.
As per this we can update the test, not to repeat the stop-unused call
as now we're sure that when the pool has no threads anymore, the unused
threads value is also updated accordingly.
Also adding a tests with multiple pools.
In this tests we wanted to ensure that all the unused threads were
stopped, however while we were calling g_thread_pool_stop_unused_threads
some threads could still be in the process of being recycled even tough
the pool's num_thread values are 0.
In fact, stopping unused threads implies also resetting back the max
unused threads to the previous value, and in this test it caused it to
go from -1 -> 0 and back to -1, after killing the unused threads we
knew about; thus any about-to-be-unused thread that is not killed during
this call will be just left around as a waiting unused thread afterwards.
However, if this function was getting called when a thread was in
between of calling the user function and the moment it was being
recycled (and so when the pool num_threads was updated), but this thread
was not counted in unused_threads, we ended up in having a race because
all the threads were consumed from our POV, but some were actually not
yet unused, and so were kept waiting forever for some new job.
To avoid this in the test, we can ensure that we stop the unused
threads until we the number of them is really 0.
Sadly we need to repeat this as we don't have a clear point in which we
are sure about the fact that our threads are done, while it would be
wrong to stop a thread that is technically not yet marked as unused.
We could also do this in g_thread_pool_stop_unused_threads() itself, but
it would make such function to wait for threads to complete, and this is
probably not what was expected in the initial API.
Fixes: #2685
We're calling g_object_notify so let's not make gobject to call it for
us.
This also allows to test that changing a property again doesn't lead to
dispatch properties being called.
This tests that we call a custom dispatch_properties_changed,
even in the absence of connected notify handlers. (A recent
optimization broke that and caused a regression in GTK).
When I optimized GObject to skip property notification
in some cases, I looked for whether the class has a
custom notify vfunc. I overlooked that that
dispatch_properties_changed can also be customized,
and if it is, we better not skip change notification.
This showed up as breakage in the adjustment tests
in the GTK testsuite.
When the system supports it (as all Linux kernels ≥ 5.3 should), it’s
preferable to use `pidfd_open()` and `waitid()` to be notified of
child processes exiting or being signalled, rather than installing a
default `SIGCHLD` handler.
A default `SIGCHLD` handler is global, and can never interact well with
other code (from the application or other libraries) which also wants to
install a `SIGCHLD` handler.
This use of `pidfd_open()` is racy (the PID may be reused between
`g_child_watch_source_new()` being called and `pidfd_open()` being
called), so it doesn’t improve behaviour there. For that, we’d need
continuous use of pidfds throughout GLib, from fork/spawn time until
here. See #1866 for that.
The use of `waitid()` to get the process exit status could be expanded
in future to also work for stopped or continued processes (as per #175)
by adding `WSTOPPED | WCONTINUED` into the flags. That’s a behaviour
change which is outside the strict scope of adding pidfd support,
though.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1866Fixes: #2216
On win32, WaitForSingleObject may return before the timeout is
dispatched, as it doesn't have a resolution higher than the system tick.
Wait for ~50ms before checking the callback changes.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Do not wakeup immediately for our own context wakeup poll registration.
g_main_context_add_poll_unlocked() will call g_wakeup_signal() to wake
up the loop waiting in poll(). Doing so during context creation will
create an extra wakeup for the first poll().
Skip the wakeup call if it is the wake_up_rec registration. No other
sources/caller should ever reach that condition.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
