This is an interoperability fix. If the line is exactly "DATA\r\n",
the reference implementation of D-Bus treats this as equivalent to
"DATA \r\n", meaning the data block consists of zero hex-encoded bytes.
In practice, D-Bus clients send empty data blocks as "DATA\r\n", and
in fact sd-bus only accepts that, rejecting "DATA \r\n".
[Originally part of a larger commit; commit message added by smcv]
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <giuseppe@scrivano.org>
Co-authored-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This attribute will produce "deprecation" warnings when using it in
code that does not want dependencies on newer GLib versions.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Using GMemorySettingsBackend before any other GSettingsBackend would
cause the following error: "Tried to implement non-registered extension
point gsettings-backend". This is due to a missing call to
_g_io_modules_ensure_extension_points_registered() in the GMemorySettingsBackend
type definition which registers the gsettings-backend extension point.
We don't need a cpp toolchain for building glib so lets just
automatically disable tests requiring one when not available.
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com>
In g_signal_parse_name we were looking up for the signal from the name
keeping the mutex locked, but we then retrieved and checked the node
data without keeping the lock, so with another thread potentially
changing that.
We used to perform unneeded lock/unlock dances to perform block, unblock
and disconnect actions, and these were potentially unsafe because we
might have looped in data that could be potentially be changed by other
threads.
We could have also done the same by saving the handlers ids in a
temporary array and eventually remove them, but I don't see a reason for
that since we can just keep all locked without the risk of creating
deadlocks.
Coverity CID: #1474757, #1474771, #1474429
Since commit 8d5a44dc in order to ensure that we were setting the errcode in
translate_compile_error(), we did an assert checking whether it was a
valid value, but we assumed that 0 was not a valid error, while it is as
it's the generic G_REGEX_ERROR_COMPILE.
So, set errcode and errmsg to invalid values before translating and
ensure we've change them.
Fixes: #2694
The test was flacky because we were only relying on the presence of a
file, while the callback could have not been called yet, while ensure
for both assumptions to be true before stop iterating the loop.
Fix a regression from commit abddb42d14, where it could pass `NULL` to
`g_task_get_cancellable()`, triggering a critical warning. This could
happen because the lifetime of `data->task` is not as long as the
lifetime of the `ConnectionAttempt`, but the code assumed it was.
Fix the problem by keeping a strong ref to that `GCancellable` around
until the `ConnectionAttempt` is finished being destroyed.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2687
ci: Specify -Wno-overlength-strings on macOS
gstdio: Do not pass wrong pointer types to FILETIME to unix conversion
build: Specify -Werror=pointer-sign
See merge request GNOME/glib!2807
This can catch the wrong pointer being passed to a function argument (in
some cases), with few false positives.
Spotted while testing !2529.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
This disables the following warning, which was causing CI failures on
macOS when building the libpcre2 subproject:
```
../subprojects/pcre2-10.40/src/pcre2_error.c:66:3: error: string literal of length 4380 exceeds maximum length 4095 that ISO C99 compilers are required to support [-Werror,-Woverlength-strings]
```
We don’t want to explicitly rely on using overlength strings in GLib,
which is why this change is a `CFLAGS` in the CI configuration, rather
than setting a project-level argument in `meson.build`.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
We ended up always skipping showing the scheduler settings errors after
the first call, while we were already setting such variable atomically
in case it needed to.
Related to: #1672
As per the rationale explained in the previous commit, we could end up
having the unused_threads value not to be conformant to what
g_thread_pool_get_num_threads() returns, because an about-to-be-unused
thread might not be counted yet as such, while the pool threads number
has been already decreased.
To avoid such scenario, and to make sure that when all the pool's
threads are stopped, they're unmarked as unused, let's increase the
unused_threads value earlier, while we still own the pool lock so that
it will always include the pool that is not used anymore, but not yet
queued.
As per this we can update the test, not to repeat the stop-unused call
as now we're sure that when the pool has no threads anymore, the unused
threads value is also updated accordingly.
Also adding a tests with multiple pools.
In this tests we wanted to ensure that all the unused threads were
stopped, however while we were calling g_thread_pool_stop_unused_threads
some threads could still be in the process of being recycled even tough
the pool's num_thread values are 0.
In fact, stopping unused threads implies also resetting back the max
unused threads to the previous value, and in this test it caused it to
go from -1 -> 0 and back to -1, after killing the unused threads we
knew about; thus any about-to-be-unused thread that is not killed during
this call will be just left around as a waiting unused thread afterwards.
However, if this function was getting called when a thread was in
between of calling the user function and the moment it was being
recycled (and so when the pool num_threads was updated), but this thread
was not counted in unused_threads, we ended up in having a race because
all the threads were consumed from our POV, but some were actually not
yet unused, and so were kept waiting forever for some new job.
To avoid this in the test, we can ensure that we stop the unused
threads until we the number of them is really 0.
Sadly we need to repeat this as we don't have a clear point in which we
are sure about the fact that our threads are done, while it would be
wrong to stop a thread that is technically not yet marked as unused.
We could also do this in g_thread_pool_stop_unused_threads() itself, but
it would make such function to wait for threads to complete, and this is
probably not what was expected in the initial API.
Fixes: #2685
