After the recent reworking of this code it was possible for `g_close()`
to be called on `fd == -1`, which is invalid. It would have reported an
error, were errors not ignored. So it was harmless, but still best to
fix.
Simplify the error handling by combining both error labels and checking
the state of `fd` dynamically.
Coverity CID: #1450834
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Some versions of compilers inline gobject_init_ctor() and
type_class_init_Wm(), so the existing suppression rules would no longer
match. Try to generalize them to handle these cases.
The variable `gconstructor_code` (which is what’s defined by
`gconstructor_as_data_h`) is not used at all inside
`glib-compile-schemas`.
This looks like a copy/paste error from the build definition for
`glib-compile-resources` below, which does need it.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
This also gives details of how to report a security issue, including the
key point that merge requests are (unfortunately) not confidential.
Heavily based on the flatpak security policy which just landed:
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/blob/master/SECURITY.md
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
In the 2.68 cycle we’d added 3 new enumerator elements. Due to the
preceding commit, they can now be annotated with
`GLIB_AVAILABLE_ENUMERATOR_IN_2_68`, which will make it a bit easier for
third party projects to notice when they’re using these symbols without
having bumped their GLib dependency.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2327
Teach `glib-mkenums` how to parse and ignore:
- `GLIB_AVAILABLE_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx`
- `GLIB_DEPRECATED_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx`
- `GLIB_DEPRECATED_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx_FOR(x)`
Future work could expose the deprecation/availability information as
substitutions in the template file, but this commit does not do that.
It does, however, add some unit tests for the annotations.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2327
`""` is not a valid path (`stat()` on it returns `ENOENT`). Previously,
a full `GLocalFile` was being created, which ended up resolving to
`$CWD`, through path canonicalisation. That isn’t right.
Fix it by creating a `GDummyFile` instead, and adding a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2328
Calling `dlopen()` with `libutil.so` makes the installed tests depend on
having glibc's development files installed. To avoid this, we can work
out the runtime library name at build time and `dlopen` that instead.
This approach is [taken from libfprint][1], thanks to Marco Trevisan.
[1]: f401f399a8
`ENXIO` can be returned from `open(2)` for special files (FIFOs, device
files and domain sockets) which are not backed by anything.
This fixes the error returned by `g_file_replace()` when trying to
replace such a file, so that it now matches the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
These test all the functionality and combinations of flags I can think
of. They do not cover dynamic behaviour (for example, what would happen
if the source file is deleted by another process part-way through a call
to `g_file_replace()`).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
The `G_FILE_CREATE_REPLACE_DESTINATION` flag is equivalent to unlinking
the destination file and re-creating it from scratch. That did
previously work, but in the process the code would call `open(O_CREAT)`
on the file. If the file was a dangling symlink, this would create the
destination file (empty). That’s not an intended side-effect, and has
security implications if the symlink is controlled by a lower-privileged
process.
Fix that by not opening the destination file if it’s a symlink, and
adjusting the rest of the code to cope with
- the fact that `fd == -1` is not an error iff `is_symlink` is true,
- and that `original_stat` will contain the `lstat()` results for the
symlink now, rather than the `stat()` results for its target (again,
iff `is_symlink` is true).
This means that the target of the dangling symlink is no longer created,
which was the bug. The symlink itself continues to be replaced (as
before) with the new file — this is the intended behaviour of
`g_file_replace()`.
The behaviour for non-symlink cases, or cases where the symlink was not
dangling, should be unchanged.
Includes a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2325
Since a following commit is going to add a new test which references
Gitlab, so it’s best to move the URI bases inside the test cases.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
