The variable `gconstructor_code` (which is what’s defined by
`gconstructor_as_data_h`) is not used at all inside
`glib-compile-schemas`.
This looks like a copy/paste error from the build definition for
`glib-compile-resources` below, which does need it.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
In the 2.68 cycle we’d added 3 new enumerator elements. Due to the
preceding commit, they can now be annotated with
`GLIB_AVAILABLE_ENUMERATOR_IN_2_68`, which will make it a bit easier for
third party projects to notice when they’re using these symbols without
having bumped their GLib dependency.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2327
Teach `glib-mkenums` how to parse and ignore:
- `GLIB_AVAILABLE_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx`
- `GLIB_DEPRECATED_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx`
- `GLIB_DEPRECATED_ENUMERATOR_IN_x_xx_FOR(x)`
Future work could expose the deprecation/availability information as
substitutions in the template file, but this commit does not do that.
It does, however, add some unit tests for the annotations.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2327
`""` is not a valid path (`stat()` on it returns `ENOENT`). Previously,
a full `GLocalFile` was being created, which ended up resolving to
`$CWD`, through path canonicalisation. That isn’t right.
Fix it by creating a `GDummyFile` instead, and adding a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2328
Calling `dlopen()` with `libutil.so` makes the installed tests depend on
having glibc's development files installed. To avoid this, we can work
out the runtime library name at build time and `dlopen` that instead.
This approach is [taken from libfprint][1], thanks to Marco Trevisan.
[1]: f401f399a8
`ENXIO` can be returned from `open(2)` for special files (FIFOs, device
files and domain sockets) which are not backed by anything.
This fixes the error returned by `g_file_replace()` when trying to
replace such a file, so that it now matches the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
These test all the functionality and combinations of flags I can think
of. They do not cover dynamic behaviour (for example, what would happen
if the source file is deleted by another process part-way through a call
to `g_file_replace()`).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
The `G_FILE_CREATE_REPLACE_DESTINATION` flag is equivalent to unlinking
the destination file and re-creating it from scratch. That did
previously work, but in the process the code would call `open(O_CREAT)`
on the file. If the file was a dangling symlink, this would create the
destination file (empty). That’s not an intended side-effect, and has
security implications if the symlink is controlled by a lower-privileged
process.
Fix that by not opening the destination file if it’s a symlink, and
adjusting the rest of the code to cope with
- the fact that `fd == -1` is not an error iff `is_symlink` is true,
- and that `original_stat` will contain the `lstat()` results for the
symlink now, rather than the `stat()` results for its target (again,
iff `is_symlink` is true).
This means that the target of the dangling symlink is no longer created,
which was the bug. The symlink itself continues to be replaced (as
before) with the new file — this is the intended behaviour of
`g_file_replace()`.
The behaviour for non-symlink cases, or cases where the symlink was not
dangling, should be unchanged.
Includes a unit test.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #2325
Since a following commit is going to add a new test which references
Gitlab, so it’s best to move the URI bases inside the test cases.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
