The retry loop for acquiring the lock for the authentication cookie file
currently tries to acquire the lock for 0.5s, then gives up, assumes the
lock file is stale, and deletes it.
That’s great if the lock file *is* stale because it’s been left there by
a crashed process.
It’s not so great if the lock file just happens to have been there every
time this process checked, because the cookie file is highly contested
while (for example) running lots of parallel unit tests.
Check for that situation by comparing the mtime of the lock file and
continuing to retry if it’s changed.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Fixes: #1929
Rather than tracking them with a counter. This should close the race in
tracking the finalisation of the tasks by the task worker thread.
There’s no way to synchronise with that thread as it’s internal to
`g_task_run_in_thread()`.
This should hopefully stop the `debugcontroller` test being flaky.
See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/2486#note_1384102
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
We are matching `<parameter>` as well as `<para>`, and we
end up with broken XML in case the (expanded) description
starts with `<parameter>`.
Fixes: #2601
We can't exercise precondition check failures if GLib was (inadvisably)
compiled with -Dglib_checks=false, and we shouldn't necessarily exercise
precondition check failures when using QA tools like valgrind, so skip
these tests if run with -m no-undefined.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Previously, these tests would always pass. If the precondition check
failed (as we want it to), the subprocess would exit unsuccessfully;
but if the precondition check wrongly passed, the subprocess would
continue, allocate a nonzero amount of memory, and fail the
g_assert_null(), resulting in the subprocess exiting unsuccessfully
and the test still passing.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
On ILP32 platforms, 4 is a valid alignment for g_aligned_alloc(), so
use 2 as our invalid alignment instead.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This allows the controller to explicitly be removed from the bus, in a
way that allows the caller to synchronise with it and know that all
other references to the controller should have been dropped (i.e. after
this method returns, there should be no in-flight D-Bus calls still
holding a reference to the object).
This is needed to be able to guarantee finalisation of the controller in
unit tests (and comparable real-world situations).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <pwithnall@endlessos.org>
Helps: #1190
The resources data is generated for both GCC and MSVC toolchains, even
though we know beforehand which toolchain we're going to compile it for.
By dropping the data duplication we make the generated resources file
faster to compile, especially when dealing with large embedded data,
instead of relying on the C pre-processor to walk the whole file and
discard the branch we're not using.
We only want to include gslist.h here if it was not already included via
including glib.h, as:
* gslist.h should normally be included via glib.h if used outside of
GLib itself.
* This broke Visual Studio builds that use GResources (via
glib-compile-resources.exe) as that would cause the generated code to
include gslist.h directly, which is therefore disallowed.
